UMaster description
|
Imaging colorimeters are all based on CCD sensors and generally color filters. The difference between the systems lays in the accuracy, the signal over noise ratio, the spatial resolution and the quality of the imaging optics. UMaster is based on a Peltier cooled CCD sensor with true 16-bit analog digital converter. Four color filters dedicated to each CCD sensor are mounted on a motorized color wheel. A second motorized wheel with flat densities is also available for an automatic adjustment to the source luminance. High Accuracy High Sensibility High Dynamic A range of imaging objectives More than just Luminance & color: Polarization |
Photograph of UMaster
Technical plans of UMaster color & density wheels
Electron beam evaporator with ion beam assistance
|
|
Principle of the telecentric lens on the sensor side
Optical diagram for standard imaging objective (top) and ELDIM's telecentric objective on the sensor (bottom)
Test pattern measured by UMaster (middle). Marks are correctly resolved up to the third line on all patterns (bottom). It's not the case with a commercial optic (top)
High magnification color image of white state on a LCD
Ultra-high magnification color image of two pixels in white state |
For accurate measurements the imaging optic plays a key role. Indeed, standard imaging optics suffer from a dependence of the flux with the distance to the object. One basic "solution" is to provide different sets of calibration for the system with all the possibilities of error that can occur. ELDIM uses a much better solution based on telecentric optic on the sensor side. A first obvious advantage is that all the light rays cross the filters with the same incidence what ensures the same spectral response everywhere on the image. Another key advantage is the independence of the flux with the object distance. Dependence of flux with distance for standard objectives We want to calculate the flux collected by and elemental surface dS1 on the detector. The conservation of the geometric etendue gives the following relation between the surfaces: Using the relation between F1, F2 and the focal length F# we finally obtain: The signal seen by the detector is then dependent on the distance of the object. At 10F# the reduction is about 20% as shown in the figure with a big impact on the accuracy. Flux stability for telecentric objectives The figure shows a flux reduction lower than 1% for 5F# distance and lower than 0.1% for 15F#. A single calibration is then sufficient for all practical distances. Theorical dependence of the flux with the object distance (standard optics and telecentric optics) MTF and Distorsion At ELDIM, optical designs and production for all equipments are home made. This ensures a high and stable quality for all our optics. ELDIM’s low distortion optics ensure a perfect image with minimized optical defect compensations. Most of common equipments compensate for important distortions by software calibration. This allows redressing line images on the border of the image but degrades the global MTF and introduces artifacts in the image. Furthermore, the modulation Fourier Transform (MTF) of our optic is very large since it allows resolving very compact line patterns. On the figure hereafter we compare the resolution of our optic to commercial optics. Also important is the MTF stability ON and OFF axis on the whole field of View. It’s easy to obtain an excellent MTF in the middle of the image (ON-axis) when not taking into account the MTF on the border of the field of view (OFF axis). ELDIM’s MTF is very stable which means that patterns in the corner of the image are as resolved as patterns in the center of the image. Additional optics for high spatial resolution |